The Office and Partners for Local Government’s
We work with local governments on AI, climate action, and development. We help your organization and the community you serve build capacity and thrive.
A casual chat over virtual coffee. No sales pitch, we promise.
and interact with it too
Consulting
The Intentional Innovation Office.
We know what a Tuesday at city hall looks like. One person, five jobs, and a council meeting tonight.
Professionals plus software. Think TurboTax or H&R Block, but for local government.

AI
Policy and Strategy · Applied AI · Operations and Implementation Support
Told to use AI, and not sure how? Want to improve processes while securing your data and public service values?
The CollectiveTurboAILimited early accessExploreClimate Action
GHG Inventories · Climate Action Planning · Operations and Implementation Support
Not sure where you stand on climate action? Spending too much time planning and not enough time doing?
The CollectiveTurboCAPNewLiveLimited early accessExploreDevelopment
Development Review · Predictive Modeling · Operations and Implementation Support
Not sure where your development review gets stuck? Too many permits running behind shot clocks?
The CollectiveTurboDevLimited early accessExplore
The Collective
JordanJerkovichMPA, MScFounder and CEOFounder of Good Local Gov and builder of One(GLG) and TurboCAP. He has sat at the permit counter and written the staff report. Former local gov CD Director and consultant. University of Kansas MPA Fellow with focus in local government management.Read full bio
WardLylesPhD, AICPStrategic Advisor for Climate ActionProfessor of urban planning at the University of Kansas and director of its Center for Compassionate and Sustainable Communities. He has led over $1M in externally funded research on climate adaptation and plan implementation.Read full bio
JosephCummingsPhDStrategic Advisor for Data and ResearchMathematician, PhD from the University of Kentucky, postdoctoral research associate at the University of Edinburgh, and author of a package distributed with Macaulay2. He designs the research and checks the analysis.Read full bio
AlexColeyMScConsultantBuilds community and First Nations relationships for carbon removal projects at pHathom, with more than a decade of community engagement across Nova Scotia’s education, health, recreation, municipal, and nonprofit sectors.Read full bio
Carolinede FilippisMSc, MAConsultantSustainability and communications strategist. As a FUSE Executive Fellow she led Wyandotte County’s first resiliency assessment, and she holds master’s degrees from Sweden’s Blekinge Institute of Technology and France’s Grenoble IAE.Read full bio
NickTvrdy ConsultantA decade in sales, business development, and team leadership across the solar, roofing, and insurance industries, with a degree in sustainable energy from Creighton. He is the one who clears the operational barriers.Read full bio
Software
Our software, all connected in One(GLG).
TurboAI, TurboCAP, and TurboDev each take on one of local government’s hardest jobs. Every one of them connects to One(GLG), the workspace for local government, so all your work can live in one place. Goodbye silos.
Software · The workspace
One(GLG)
Limited early access
One place that pulls it all together: the connected workspace for local government, built by local government people who have actually done the job. Every app below runs inside it.
Good morning.
City of Maplewood · Tuesday · council meets at 6 PM
Needs you
3 decisions
A packet summary, a grant fit, a reply
Drafted for you
4 replies
Waiting for your yes in OneBox
Tonight
Council, 6 PM
Packet assembled · 2 items yours
First things first
Your morning, in order
- Approve the council packet summaryPebble drafted it from the staff reports9:00
- Reply to the Parks Board chairDraft ready in your voice9:15
- Check the grant Scout foundFits the adopted Parks plan · due Nov 310:00
- Work session: budget memoPlan approved · 4 steps1:00
OneBox
Email, texts, and messages in one place · 12 new · 4 drafted
Inbox
Sorted for you
- Parks Board chairRe: trail closure notice · reply drafted8:31
- County Public WorksJoint culvert project · meeting request8:02
- Resident, Elm StreetStreetlight out · routed to Public Works7:48
- State grants officeRound two opens Nov 1Mon
Draft · in your voice
Re: trail closure notice
Thanks for flagging this. The closure runs through Friday while the culvert is replaced; I have asked Public Works to post detour signs at both trailheads today.
SendShorterEdit
Planner
Council week · 14 tasks · 3 due today
To do
Budget memo, first draft
Call the county about the culvert
Review Scout’s grant match
In progress
Council packet summary
Parks plan update
Waiting
Legal review: trail easement
Finance: Q3 numbers
Done
Agenda posted
Staff reports in
Office
Work session · budget memo · plan ready
Work session
Budget memo for council
Pebble proposes a plan from your own budget memo procedure. Nothing runs until you approve it.
- Pull the Q3 numbersFrom Finance’s shared sheet
- Compare to the adopted budgetBy department
- Draft the memoIn the city’s memo template
- Send to the City Manager for reviewYou approve before it goes
Approve the planChange a step
File Cabinet
Plans, policies, and records · searchable, with sources
Plans
Comprehensive Plan 2040
Adopted 2023
Policies
AI use policy
Adopted by council
Records
Council minutes
2019 to today
Answer, with sources
Can a trail close without council action?
Yes, for up to 30 days. The Parks Director may close a trail for public safety; longer closures go to council.
Municipal Code § 12.08.040 · Parks Policy 4.2
Your apps
TurboAI, TurboCAP, and TurboDev, inside One(GLG)
TurboAI
5 AI uses · policy adopted
TurboCAP
130,308 t baseline · plan draft
TurboDev
Permit review · early access
Connected
One place for the work they make
Your climate plan’s tasks land in Planner, TurboAI’s approvals land in Today, and every report is filed in the File Cabinet.
Good morning.
City of Maplewood · Tuesday · council meets at 6 PM
Needs you
3 decisions
A packet summary, a grant fit, a reply
Drafted for you
4 replies
Waiting for your yes in OneBox
Tonight
Council, 6 PM
Packet assembled · 2 items yours
First things first
Your morning, in order
- Approve the council packet summaryPebble drafted it from the staff reports9:00
- Reply to the Parks Board chairDraft ready in your voice9:15
- Check the grant Scout foundFits the adopted Parks plan · due Nov 310:00
- Work session: budget memoPlan approved · 4 steps1:00
OneBox
Email, texts, and messages in one place · 12 new · 4 drafted
Inbox
Sorted for you
- Parks Board chairRe: trail closure notice · reply drafted8:31
- County Public WorksJoint culvert project · meeting request8:02
- Resident, Elm StreetStreetlight out · routed to Public Works7:48
- State grants officeRound two opens Nov 1Mon
Draft · in your voice
Re: trail closure notice
Thanks for flagging this. The closure runs through Friday while the culvert is replaced; I have asked Public Works to post detour signs at both trailheads today.
SendShorterEdit
Planner
Council week · 14 tasks · 3 due today
To do
Budget memo, first draft
Call the county about the culvert
Review Scout’s grant match
In progress
Council packet summary
Parks plan update
Waiting
Legal review: trail easement
Finance: Q3 numbers
Done
Agenda posted
Staff reports in
Office
Work session · budget memo · plan ready
Work session
Budget memo for council
Pebble proposes a plan from your own budget memo procedure. Nothing runs until you approve it.
- Pull the Q3 numbersFrom Finance’s shared sheet
- Compare to the adopted budgetBy department
- Draft the memoIn the city’s memo template
- Send to the City Manager for reviewYou approve before it goes
Approve the planChange a step
File Cabinet
Plans, policies, and records · searchable, with sources
Plans
Comprehensive Plan 2040
Adopted 2023
Policies
AI use policy
Adopted by council
Records
Council minutes
2019 to today
Answer, with sources
Can a trail close without council action?
Yes, for up to 30 days. The Parks Director may close a trail for public safety; longer closures go to council.
Municipal Code § 12.08.040 · Parks Policy 4.2
Your apps
TurboAI, TurboCAP, and TurboDev, inside One(GLG)
TurboAI
5 AI uses · policy adopted
TurboCAP
130,308 t baseline · plan draft
TurboDev
Permit review · early access
Connected
One place for the work they make
Your climate plan’s tasks land in Planner, TurboAI’s approvals land in Today, and every report is filed in the File Cabinet.
- One(GLG) different">
- The whole office, one place.Work, communications, information, and insights in one calm workspace, not another tab.
- AI that stays in the background.Every tool shows its work and waits for a human yes.
- Work that follows your procedures.A work session opens with a plan you approve, then runs the steps of your own workflows.
- Your apps live inside it.TurboCAP runs in it today. TurboAI and TurboDev come next, shaped by the first cohort.
Software · AI
TurboAI
Limited early accessConnects with One(GLG)
Where your AI work lives: the policy your council adopts, the automations your staff approve, and a plain record of how you use AI that you can show the public. We are building it with the first cohort.
TurboAI
Concept · sample dataCity of Maplewood
How the city uses AI · five uses in service · every one with a person who decides
AI use policy
The rules council adopted
- A person decides. AI drafts, flags and suggests; a named staff member approves.
- Your data stays yours. Nothing the city enters trains an outside model.
- Say when AI was used. Residents can see where AI helped and who decided.
- Review every year. Council revisits the policy and the uses each budget cycle.
Human in the lead
Every use has a named person who decides, and every AI action leaves an audit trail you can show council.
AI in service
Where AI helps, and who decides
| Use | What the AI does | Who decides |
|---|---|---|
| Permit completeness checkCommunity Development | Flags missing items | Permit technician approves |
| Council packet summariesCity Clerk | Drafts each summary | Clerk edits and approves |
| 311 request routingPublic Works | Suggests a crew | Dispatcher decides |
| Grant searchFinance | Finds matches | Finance director reviews |
| Meeting minutes draftCity Clerk | Drafts from the recording | Clerk approves |
Human in the lead
Every use has a named person who decides, and every AI action leaves an audit trail you can show council.
Automations
Repetitive work, with a human yes
| Automation | When it runs | Who approves |
|---|---|---|
| Packet assemblyCity Clerk | Before each council meeting | Clerk |
| New application checkCommunity Development | On every application | Permit technician |
| Request triagePublic Works | On every 311 request | Dispatcher |
Human in the lead
Every use has a named person who decides, and every AI action leaves an audit trail you can show council.
Agents
Named helpers, each with a job and a person in charge
| Agent | Its job | Who it answers to |
|---|---|---|
| PebbleOffice assistant | Drafts notes, replies and summaries | The staff member who asked |
| ScoutGrant scout | Finds grants that fit adopted plans | Finance director |
| HootRecords clerk | Answers records requests from published documents | City Clerk |
Human in the lead
Every use has a named person who decides, and every AI action leaves an audit trail you can show council.
AI spend this month
$148.00 at cost, no surcharge
Human in the lead
Every use has a named person who decides, and every AI action leaves an audit trail you can show council.
Public report
What residents can see
- Every AI use, in plain language, with the department that runs it.
- Who decides for each one, by role.
- What it costs, passed through at cost.
- The policy council adopted, and when it is next reviewed.
Human in the lead
Every use has a named person who decides, and every AI action leaves an audit trail you can show council.
TurboAI
Concept · sample dataCity of Maplewood
How the city uses AI · five uses in service · every one with a person who decides
AI use policy
The rules council adopted
- A person decides. AI drafts, flags and suggests; a named staff member approves.
- Your data stays yours. Nothing the city enters trains an outside model.
- Say when AI was used. Residents can see where AI helped and who decided.
- Review every year. Council revisits the policy and the uses each budget cycle.
Human in the lead
Every use has a named person who decides, and every AI action leaves an audit trail you can show council.
AI in service
Where AI helps, and who decides
| Use | What the AI does | Who decides |
|---|---|---|
| Permit completeness checkCommunity Development | Flags missing items | Permit technician approves |
| Council packet summariesCity Clerk | Drafts each summary | Clerk edits and approves |
| 311 request routingPublic Works | Suggests a crew | Dispatcher decides |
| Grant searchFinance | Finds matches | Finance director reviews |
| Meeting minutes draftCity Clerk | Drafts from the recording | Clerk approves |
Human in the lead
Every use has a named person who decides, and every AI action leaves an audit trail you can show council.
Automations
Repetitive work, with a human yes
| Automation | When it runs | Who approves |
|---|---|---|
| Packet assemblyCity Clerk | Before each council meeting | Clerk |
| New application checkCommunity Development | On every application | Permit technician |
| Request triagePublic Works | On every 311 request | Dispatcher |
Human in the lead
Every use has a named person who decides, and every AI action leaves an audit trail you can show council.
Agents
Named helpers, each with a job and a person in charge
| Agent | Its job | Who it answers to |
|---|---|---|
| PebbleOffice assistant | Drafts notes, replies and summaries | The staff member who asked |
| ScoutGrant scout | Finds grants that fit adopted plans | Finance director |
| HootRecords clerk | Answers records requests from published documents | City Clerk |
Human in the lead
Every use has a named person who decides, and every AI action leaves an audit trail you can show council.
AI spend this month
$148.00 at cost, no surcharge
Human in the lead
Every use has a named person who decides, and every AI action leaves an audit trail you can show council.
Public report
What residents can see
- Every AI use, in plain language, with the department that runs it.
- Who decides for each one, by role.
- What it costs, passed through at cost.
- The policy council adopted, and when it is next reviewed.
Human in the lead
Every use has a named person who decides, and every AI action leaves an audit trail you can show council.
- Policy first.Start from an AI use policy your council can adopt.
- A person approves every step.Automations take the repetitive work off your staff’s plate, and nothing goes out without a human yes.
- Ready when the public asks.A plain record of where and how you use AI, to share with council and residents.
- AI at cost.Usage passes through at cost, with no surcharge, and your workflows and agents stay yours.
Software · Climate Action
TurboCAP
NewLiveLimited early accessConnects with One(GLG)
Now live. Climate action, from the first inventory to the work getting done. Upload your data in a chat with Leif, an Intentional AI Climate Analyst, see your report preview, and our team verifies every inventory before your full report is released. Then build your plan and put it to work in One(GLG).








- GPC-compliant GHG inventories with EPA factors, verified by our team
- Climate Action Plan and Implementation Plan, built with Leif or from the plan you have
- Every action becomes a task in Planner, beside your everyday work
- A coalition view for regions working together
Software · Development
TurboDev
Limited early accessConnects with One(GLG)
Advanced analytics and data science on your own permit records: where development review gets stuck, why it gets stuck there, and what is likely to slow it next. We are building it with the first cohort.
TurboDev
Concept · sample dataCity of Maplewood
FY 2024 development review · 1,284 permits · six phases, from your own permit records
The pipeline
Where a permit spends its 47 days
- 3 dIntake
- 6 dCompleteness
- 14 dPlan review
- 21 dCorrections
- 5 dRe-review
- 2 dIssuance
Six phases from application to issued permit. Corrections take the longest, and most of that wait is the applicant’s turn.
The 1,284 permits, by type
From your own records
Every number traces to a permit you can open, so staff and council are looking at the same review.
Where review time goes
Median days in each phase, by permit type
- Residential, new42 d
- Residential addition49 d
- Commercial, new63 d
- Tenant improvement30 d
IntakeCompletenessPlan reviewCorrectionsRe-reviewIssuance
Biggest bottleneck
Residential additions wait 21 days in corrections, 43% of their review. Most corrections trace back to the same missing items on the site plan.
From your own records
Every number traces to a permit you can open, so staff and council are looking at the same review.
Root causes
Why corrections happen, traced to the step they start at
| Cause | Share of corrections | Where it starts |
|---|---|---|
| Missing setbacks or easementsSite plan | 31% | Intake checklist |
| Incomplete drainage planCivil sheets | 18% | Completeness review |
| Fire access not shownSite plan | 12% | Intake checklist |
| Zoning data mismatchApplication form | 9% | Intake form |
| Structural calcs missingPlan set | 7% | Completeness review |
First fix
Four of the top five start at intake. A site plan checklist at the counter would remove about half of all corrections.
From your own records
Every number traces to a permit you can open, so staff and council are looking at the same review.
Forecast
The next two quarters, from your own trend
Staffing
At current staffing the median rises to 54 days by Q2. One more plan reviewer holds it at 45, and the model shows the week to add them.
From your own records
Every number traces to a permit you can open, so staff and council are looking at the same review.
The report
What council gets, in one month instead of six
- Where review gets stuck, by phase and permit type, from your own records.
- The root cause of each delay, traced to the step where it starts.
- What is likely to slow it next, with the staff to plan for it.
- A short list of fixes, ordered by how many days each one saves.
From your own records
Every number traces to a permit you can open, so staff and council are looking at the same review.
TurboDev
Concept · sample dataCity of Maplewood
FY 2024 development review · 1,284 permits · six phases, from your own permit records
The pipeline
Where a permit spends its 47 days
- 3 dIntake
- 6 dCompleteness
- 14 dPlan review
- 21 dCorrections
- 5 dRe-review
- 2 dIssuance
Six phases from application to issued permit. Corrections take the longest, and most of that wait is the applicant’s turn.
The 1,284 permits, by type
From your own records
Every number traces to a permit you can open, so staff and council are looking at the same review.
Where review time goes
Median days in each phase, by permit type
- Residential, new42 d
- Residential addition49 d
- Commercial, new63 d
- Tenant improvement30 d
IntakeCompletenessPlan reviewCorrectionsRe-reviewIssuance
Biggest bottleneck
Residential additions wait 21 days in corrections, 43% of their review. Most corrections trace back to the same missing items on the site plan.
From your own records
Every number traces to a permit you can open, so staff and council are looking at the same review.
Root causes
Why corrections happen, traced to the step they start at
| Cause | Share of corrections | Where it starts |
|---|---|---|
| Missing setbacks or easementsSite plan | 31% | Intake checklist |
| Incomplete drainage planCivil sheets | 18% | Completeness review |
| Fire access not shownSite plan | 12% | Intake checklist |
| Zoning data mismatchApplication form | 9% | Intake form |
| Structural calcs missingPlan set | 7% | Completeness review |
First fix
Four of the top five start at intake. A site plan checklist at the counter would remove about half of all corrections.
From your own records
Every number traces to a permit you can open, so staff and council are looking at the same review.
Forecast
The next two quarters, from your own trend
Staffing
At current staffing the median rises to 54 days by Q2. One more plan reviewer holds it at 45, and the model shows the week to add them.
From your own records
Every number traces to a permit you can open, so staff and council are looking at the same review.
The report
What council gets, in one month instead of six
- Where review gets stuck, by phase and permit type, from your own records.
- The root cause of each delay, traced to the step where it starts.
- What is likely to slow it next, with the staff to plan for it.
- A short list of fixes, ordered by how many days each one saves.
From your own records
Every number traces to a permit you can open, so staff and council are looking at the same review.
- Every bottleneck, located.Time in each phase of review, by permit type, from intake to issuance.
- The root cause of each delay.Traced back to the step where it starts.
- What comes next.Predictive models forecast volume and timelines, so you can plan staff ahead of the trouble.
- One month instead of six.A development services review with deeper analysis, clearer reports, and people behind it who have done the work.
The first cohort
The first cohort is open for all four, with limited spots for three to five communities each.
Pick one, or all of them that you’re interested in.
Pricing
Public Service Pricing.
We price to your budget and your spending authority, not to a rate card.
Three ways we partner with you.
- A single projectOne scoped question, fixed fee, delivered.
- A project, plus a retainer for supportThe plan is done; we stay to do the work, month over month.
- A full partnershipThe whole function, part-time and ongoing: we’re your intentional innovation office.
We’ll talk through pricing terms that work within your budget. If we are not a good fit, we will happily connect you with another provider who is.
A lot of companies say they mean well.
We wrote it into the contract.
- No AI surcharge. Ever.We pass AI usage through at cost and never profit from it, so we have no reason to put AI into everything. The only way we earn is by delivering real value and keeping you as a partner. Our goal is not a good fourth quarter this year. It is a good fourth quarter thirty-five years from now.
- You own your data, your workflows, and your agents, even if we go out of business.This is about resilience. Your data and workflows are your documented institutional knowledge, so they stay yours, not ours. You need to run on them whether or not the AI is working that day, whether or not a vendor stays in business, and whether or not AI is in the picture at all.
- Humans stay in the lead.This is how we protect trust, democracy, and the integrity of public service. Every action leaves an audit trail, with a person you can reach, human oversight, and clear accountability. It is about the future of local government: protecting it, and making it better.
If we break one of those, the contract ends.
The conversation
None of this works if we build it alone.
It has to be built with the people doing the work. We want to sit down with as many local government professionals as we can and hear what you think of what we’ve built.
Here’s what we’ll ask you:
- What’s useful?
- What’s missing?
- Where did we get your job right, and where did we get it wrong?
From those conversations, we’ll build a first cohort of three to five communities that want to do this work better. More on that soon.
Tell us what you are wrestling with. · We read before we talk. · A thirty-minute call. · A scoped proposal.
Thanks. That reached a person, not a queue. We will write back.